Last call for comments on SRFI 122: Nonempty Intervals and Generalized Arrays
Arthur A. Gleckler
(29 Nov 2016 23:51 UTC)
|
Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 122: Nonempty Intervals and Generalized Arrays
John Cowan
(01 Dec 2016 02:14 UTC)
|
Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 122: Nonempty Intervals and Generalized Arrays
Sudarshan S Chawathe
(03 Dec 2016 22:35 UTC)
|
Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 122: Nonempty Intervals and Generalized Arrays
Bradley Lucier
(05 Dec 2016 18:35 UTC)
|
Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 122: Nonempty Intervals and Generalized Arrays Bradley Lucier (05 Dec 2016 18:53 UTC)
|
Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 122: Nonempty Intervals and Generalized Arrays
Bradley Lucier
(09 Dec 2016 22:00 UTC)
|
Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 122: Nonempty Intervals and Generalized Arrays Bradley Lucier 05 Dec 2016 18:53 UTC
On 12/05/2016 01:35 PM, Bradley Lucier wrote: > On 11/30/2016 09:13 PM, John Cowan wrote: >> 1) I think that interval-divide is a better name than interval-curry. >> It reflects the analogous use of "divide" in Codd's' relational algebra. > > About naming what is now called interval-curry: > > 1. One could use a term from colloquial English---divide or split, say. > (I don't like "chop" because in my use of colloquial English one often > discards the part that's been chopped off.) > > 2. One could use a suggestive term from a related field. > > I chose "interval-curry" from currying in programming languages. > > John suggests "interval-divide" from the division operator in Codd's > relational algebra. > > After thinking about it, I'm going to use "interval-projections". The > result of the operation is the same as the projection operator in > relational algebra; I forgot to mention that I find Codd's projection operator a lot easier to understand than the division operator. it's also projections in set theory. It returns two > projections of the interval, which are chosen by the second parameter. > > Brad