Re: Revised documentation and tests for various Haar wavelet transforms Bradley Lucier 07 Dec 2017 01:39 UTC

Well, I started this round of changes when I realized that what I called the “Haar transform” in the SRFI-122 document is really the “hyperbolic Haar transform”.

So there was an error in the examples.

Brad

> On Dec 6, 2017, at 6:06 PM, Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Bradley Lucier <xxxxxx@math.purdue.edu> wrote:
>
> I've updated the srfi-122 document to correct the discussion about separable transforms and Haar wavelets.
>
> In doing so, I took the opportunity to refactor and simplify the code in that section of examples.
>
> ​Thank you very much.  Since these changes aren't fixes to errata, I haven't incorporated them into the final document.  However, I've added a note pointing to your message at the bottom of the Status section.  That way, readers will be able to find your latest work.​
>
> ​Regards,
>
>
> SRFI Editor​
>
> To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=eQE4D0z1L0TMsKoNKkzhpM18pBIsmHox