Re: Updated fork of SRFI 122, Nonempty Intervals and Generalized Arrays Per Bothner 30 Oct 2018 00:54 UTC
On 10/28/18 11:08 AM, John Cowan wrote: > By all means write it up as a SRFI, then, and I'll add it to the ballot, even though we'll be voting before it can be finalized. There is precedent for this, as long as there is a spec to work from. Arthur is letting specs be posted without implementation these days, though not finalized without implementation. See http://per.bothner.com/tmp/srfi-arrays.html for a first draft. There is an implementation - but it is not portable, and has not been written up in the draft. -- --Per Bothner xxxxxx@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/