Getter for no field Takashi Kato (07 Sep 2015 12:16 UTC)
Re: Getter for no field taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (07 Sep 2015 12:49 UTC)
Re: Getter for no field Takashi Kato (07 Sep 2015 13:05 UTC)
Re: Getter for no field taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (07 Sep 2015 13:38 UTC)

Getter for no field Takashi Kato 07 Sep 2015 12:16 UTC

I've just noticed the SRFI doesn't specify the following case:

    (ref box)

The box is, for example, SRFI-111 Boxes object which doesn't have
any field by definition (am I correct?). How should this case behave?
I think it's nice to accept this.

Cheers,

_/_/

Takashi Kato

Email: xxxxxx@ymail.com