On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Sudarshan S Chawathe <xxxxxx@eip10.org> wrote:
I believe there is still a mismatch between the document's description
of hash-table-pop! and its sample implementation (which expects
additional arguments and seems to have significantly different
semantics).
Thank you, Sudarshan.
John, I'm going to wait to finalize SRFI 125 to give you a chance to respond to this feedback.