Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer scripsit [on SRFI-126 mailing list]:

> However, you'd need to remove many of the utility procedures with
> strange semantics,

If you itemize the ones you have objections to, and what is strange
about their semantics, I'll consider it case-by-case.

> remove the bimap API,

I'll remove it in the next draft, and put it into a later SRFI when it's
clear if we are going to have a merger or not.

> and perhaps most importantly, remove the dependency on SRFI-114.

I'll think about that one.

--
"Well, I'm back."  --Sam        John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>