Re: hash-table-union! John Cowan 12 Sep 2015 05:58 UTC

Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit:

> It would be nice to have a functional version of hash-table-union! with
> this signature:

With -copy, the functional versions are one-liners.

> In fact, the imperative version should take an optional merge-proc, too,
> rather than just overwriting the second hash table's values.  That would
> make it handle many more use cases.

What are these use cases of which you speak?

John Cowan
Your worships will perhaps be thinking that it is an easy thing
to blow up a dog? [Or] to write a book?
    --Don Quixote, Introduction