Community preference so far?
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(26 Sep 2015 17:29 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
Alex Shinn
(29 Sep 2015 02:43 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(29 Sep 2015 09:17 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(29 Sep 2015 11:00 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
Alex Shinn
(30 Sep 2015 03:16 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(30 Sep 2015 09:37 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
Alex Shinn
(30 Sep 2015 14:02 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(30 Sep 2015 20:44 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(01 Oct 2015 08:36 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(29 Sep 2015 11:36 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(01 Oct 2015 12:53 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
Alex Shinn
(30 Sep 2015 03:32 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(30 Sep 2015 08:56 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
Alex Shinn
(30 Sep 2015 09:38 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(30 Sep 2015 09:46 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(30 Sep 2015 10:03 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far? Evan Hanson (30 Sep 2015 11:54 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(30 Sep 2015 22:34 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
Per Bothner
(29 Sep 2015 11:14 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
John Cowan
(29 Sep 2015 12:07 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
Per Bothner
(29 Sep 2015 12:47 UTC)
|
Re: Community preference so far?
Alex Shinn
(30 Sep 2015 09:15 UTC)
|
On 2015-09-30 12:03, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer wrote: > Are these OK? In particular, is it OK that dec! errors when no > association exists, and inc! makes it start from 0 automatically? That's pretty odd. I'd say (hash-table-dec! ht <nonexistent> 5) ; => -5 Evan