Hello, John and Taylan.  SRFI 126 just went into final
status, and I'm guessing that SRFI 125 be finished sometime
soon, too.  Since both cover hash table APIs, and indeed
since 126 was written specifically as an alternative to 125,
it would be useful to compare them.

After SRFI 125 goes into final status, would you each be
willing to publish a message giving your design rationale
with respect to the other SRFI?  There's nothing that says
that both SRFI can't be provided by the same Scheme
implementation, but it would be nice for implementors to
hear "from the horse's mouth," so to speak, why each of you
made the decisions you did.

Thank you both.