SRFI 125 draft 8 comments
Sudarshan S Chawathe
(07 May 2016 21:13 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI 125 draft 8 comments
Sudarshan S Chawathe
(07 May 2016 21:38 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI 125 draft 8 comments
Per Bothner
(07 May 2016 22:12 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI 125 draft 8 comments
John Cowan
(08 May 2016 02:17 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI 125 draft 8 comments
John Cowan
(08 May 2016 17:48 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI 125 draft 8 comments
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(09 May 2016 07:03 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI 125 draft 8 comments
John Cowan
(09 May 2016 20:13 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI 125 draft 8 comments
Arthur A. Gleckler
(09 May 2016 20:25 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI 125 draft 8 comments taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (12 May 2016 15:49 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI 125 draft 8 comments taylanbayirli@xxxxxx 12 May 2016 15:49 UTC
Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> writes: > Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer <xxxxxx@gmail.com> writes: > > | How do I atone for this? There is no official errata > | process for SRFIs, is there? It's a nontrivial change, > | too. > > I've established one, documented as the final entry in the > FAQ: > > <http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-faq.html> > > The idea is to use it only for small corrections. This > change seems small enough, but I'd like to hear feedback on > the mailing list before making the change. Does anyone have > a strong objection to making this change? FYI, I've now made a pull request for the fix. Taylan