Re: SRFI 125 draft 9: (minor) hash-table-count (& -find) argument order
John Cowan 17 May 2016 20:22 UTC
Sudarshan S Chawathe scripsit:
> There's probably a good case to be made for leaving the current spec as
> is, perhaps to always have the hash-table as the first argument of the
> "whole hash table" procedures. I mention it just in case this design is
> not intentional.
It's not intentional. I'll send out a fix for this and the -pop
implementation problem, hopefully tonight (NYC time).
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan xxxxxx@ccil.org
I now introduce Professor Smullyan, who will prove to you that either
he doesn't exist or you don't exist, but you won't know which.
--Melvin Fitting