SRFI 125 draft 9: (minor) hash-table-count (& -find) argument order Sudarshan S Chawathe 17 May 2016 16:01 UTC
Re: SRFI 125 draft 9: (minor) hash-table-count (& -find) argument order John Cowan 17 May 2016 20:22 UTC

Re: SRFI 125 draft 9: (minor) hash-table-count (& -find) argument order John Cowan 17 May 2016 20:22 UTC

Sudarshan S Chawathe scripsit:

> There's probably a good case to be made for leaving the current spec as
> is, perhaps to always have the hash-table as the first argument of the
> "whole hash table" procedures.  I mention it just in case this design is
> not intentional.

It's not intentional.  I'll send out a fix for this and the -pop
implementation problem, hopefully tonight (NYC time).

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
I now introduce Professor Smullyan, who will prove to you that either
he doesn't exist or you don't exist, but you won't know which.
                               --Melvin Fitting