On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

I think it would be very useful to specify external representation
(reader syntax) for hash tables, but I want to make sure I'm not adding
anything unreasonable to the spec. External representation is a big
deal since it changes the lexical syntax.

Speaker in my role as a reader, not the editor, I like the idea, but would suggest making it a separate SRFI since it is independent of the other API issues under discussion.