On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 11:51 AM, John Cowan <xxxxxx@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit:

> This is just a reminder that SRFI 125 reaches
> the end of its extended ninety-day discussion period
> <http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-process.html> today.  (It was first
> published on 7 Sep.)  The discussion can go on, but in theory, the
> longest extension is supposed to be to ninety days.

Since 125 and 126 are friendly competitors and much of the discussion
of potentially shared features has been on the 126 list, I think 125
should be automatically extended to the end date of 126.  Bounds and
salt are outstanding issues for both 125 and 126.

That's reasonable.  SRFI 126 was originally published one day after SRFI 125, so I'll be sending a ninety-day reminder to that list (CC-ed) tomorrow.)

125 also needs to be revised to make use of 128 rather than 114
comparators, which will require updating the implementation.

Okay, so 125 definitely needs more work.

I'll nag everyone once again at 120 days (5 Jan).