On 09/28/2015 07:43 PM, Alex Shinn wrote:
> Drop the external representation.  We can handle this uniformaly
> in something like SRFI-10.

I think it is good to have a standardized external representation.
Using SRFI-10 has the known problems - and looks ugly IMP.
In any case, even if SRFI-10 is used, it should be standardized.
Using an existing syntax (already used in Racket, at least),
which appears reasonably sane, seem like it makes sense.
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/