On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:39 PM, John Cowan <xxxxxx@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit:

> These represent substantive changes, not just fixes for simple errata.  I'd
> be happy to add a section early in the document, clearly labeled as a
> post-finalization addition, that explains these changes, but I'd rather not
> make changes to the rest of the document.

Okay, in that case things are much simpler:

        Post-finalization note:  Because SRFI 114 has been deprecated
        by SRFI 128, it is recommended that implementers make use of
        SRFI 128 rather than SRFI 114 comparators where comparators are
        specified in this SRFI.  Specifically, the procedures `set`,
        `bag`, `set-unfold`, `bag-unfold`, `set-map`, `list->set`,
        `list->bag`, and `alist->bag`, should accept SRFI 128 rather
        than SRFI 114 comparators as arguments.  By the same token, the
        results of `set-element-comparator` and `bag-element-comparator`,
        as well as the values of `set-comparator` and `bag-comparator`,
        should be SRFI 128 comparators.  The sample implementation has
        been updated to depend on SRFI 128 rather than SRFI 114.

That sounds good to me.  If there are no objections on these mailing lists this week, send me a diff or a new version with this change and I'll post it.

Thanks.