Re: SRFI 128: ninety days
John Cowan 25 Jan 2016 01:10 UTC
Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit:
> This is just a reminder that SRFI 128 reaches the end of its
> extended ninety-day discussion period today. (It was first
> published on 26 Oct 2015.) The discussion can go on, but in
> theory, the longest extension is supposed to be to ninety
> days.
As far as I am concerned, the only thing left to discuss is the
with-hash-salt macro, which is new in this draft and may or may
not make sense. (There is no equivalent in SRFI 126, where salt
is a constant per execution of the program.) I'd like some
feedback on it.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan xxxxxx@ccil.org
Well, I have news for our current leaders and the leaders of tomorrow:
the Bill of Rights is not a frivolous luxury, in force only during
times of peace and prosperity. We don't just push it to the side
when the going gets tough. --Molly Ivins