SRFI 128: ninety days Arthur A. Gleckler (25 Jan 2016 00:40 UTC)
Re: SRFI 128: ninety days John Cowan (25 Jan 2016 01:10 UTC)

Re: SRFI 128: ninety days John Cowan 25 Jan 2016 01:10 UTC

Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit:

> This is just a reminder that SRFI 128 reaches the end of its
> extended ninety-day discussion period today.  (It was first
> published on 26 Oct 2015.)  The discussion can go on, but in
> theory, the longest extension is supposed to be to ninety
> days.

As far as I am concerned, the only thing left to discuss is the
with-hash-salt macro, which is new in this draft and may or may
not make sense.  (There is no equivalent in SRFI 126, where salt
is a constant per execution of the program.)  I'd like some
feedback on it.

John Cowan
Well, I have news for our current leaders and the leaders of tomorrow:
the Bill of Rights is not a frivolous luxury, in force only during
times of peace and prosperity.  We don't just push it to the side
when the going gets tough.  --Molly Ivins