Re: [scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-128] CHICKEN Packaging (#2)
Arthur A. Gleckler 02 May 2016 17:05 UTC
Jeremy Steward <xxxxxx@thatgeoguy.ca> writes:
| Indeed, this seems to be the convention I kept last
| time. My apologies as it slipped my mind. You are correct
| on this aspect, so please name the tag CHICKEN-0.1. I
| would have preferred these to be 1.0 myself (since the
| SRFI is in final status), however srfi-128 had already
| been "packaged" by another user, so I left it at 0.1 to
| maintain consistency.
>
| Thanks for the reminder about this, I had completely
| overlooked it. No code should need to be changed, as I
| stuck to the convention I had used previously when
| packaging these eggs.
Thanks for checking.
I've added the tag "CHICKEN-0.1" to both repositories.
Thanks again for this work.