Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit:

> These represent substantive changes, not just fixes for simple errata.  I'd
> be happy to add a section early in the document, clearly labeled as a
> post-finalization addition, that explains these changes, but I'd rather not
> make changes to the rest of the document.

Okay, in that case things are much simpler:

	Post-finalization note:  Because SRFI 114 has been deprecated
	by SRFI 128, it is recommended that implementers make use of
	SRFI 128 rather than SRFI 114 comparators where comparators are
	specified in this SRFI.  Specifically, the procedures `set`,
	`bag`, `set-unfold`, `bag-unfold`, `set-map`, `list->set`,
	`list->bag`, and `alist->bag`, should accept SRFI 128 rather
	than SRFI 114 comparators as arguments.  By the same token, the
	results of `set-element-comparator` and `bag-element-comparator`,
	as well as the values of `set-comparator` and `bag-comparator`,
	should be SRFI 128 comparators.  The sample implementation has
	been updated to depend on SRFI 128 rather than SRFI 114.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
Adam [...] did not want the apple for the apple's sake, he wanted it only
because it was forbidden. The mistake was not forbidding the serpent;
then he would have eaten the serpent. --Mark Twain