Then how about just "foo" instead of "foo/whole"?

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:46 AM, John Cowan <xxxxxx@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
Alex Shinn scripsit:

> Regardless, foo/whole is redundant with making the arguments
> optional for either version.

Sure.  The idea is to get rid of optional arguments.  Either whole,
or start and end indexes, or start and end cursors.  If you want to
layer an unmarked version of foo on top of any two, you can.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
        Only do what only you can do.
        --Edsger W. Dijkstra's advice to a student in search of a thesis