Alex Shinn scripsit:

> I would prefer a full replacement for SRFI-13.  From this perspective,
> we can have `string-join' etc. in SRFI-130 without the /cursors suffix.

Just because it's in a different SRFI doesn't mean it has to be in a different
R7RS-large library, which would be my intention.  It's just as easy to
give the voters a choice between SRFI 13 and SRFI 13+130 as between
SRFI 13 and SRFI 130.

In addition, merging the texts involves making their formats look alike,
which takes a lot of energy I don't have right now.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
Do what you will / this Life's a Fiction
And is made up of / Contradiction.  --William Blake