New draft (#8) of SRFI 130: Cursor-based string library Arthur A. Gleckler (23 May 2016 17:19 UTC)
|
Re: New draft (#8) of SRFI 130: Cursor-based string library
John Cowan
(23 May 2016 21:17 UTC)
|
Re: New draft (#8) of SRFI 130: Cursor-based string library
Arthur A. Gleckler
(23 May 2016 21:39 UTC)
|
Re: New draft (#8) of SRFI 130: Cursor-based string library
William D Clinger
(24 May 2016 04:02 UTC)
|
Re: New draft (#8) of SRFI 130: Cursor-based string library
Arthur A. Gleckler
(24 May 2016 04:10 UTC)
|
New draft (#8) of SRFI 130: Cursor-based string library Arthur A. Gleckler 23 May 2016 17:19 UTC
I've just published draft #8 of SRFI 130. This draft contains code changes only; the document was not updated. It was submitted by Will Clinger. <http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-130/> Here are Will's comments: Added a new test program, fixed quite a few bugs that it found in the two previous sample implementations, and added a third implementation that imports most of its procedures from (srfi 13) instead of re-implementing them. The test program and all three sample implementations have been tested in both Larceny and Sagittarius. The two non-R7RS files named srfi-130.scm have not been tested, nor have the two files named srfi-130.sld been tested. In fact, the two files named srfi-130.sld are known to be incorrect; for details, run a diff between them and the files named 130.sld. The srfi-130.sld files are superseded by the 130.sld files, and it might have been better to delete them. I suspect they were written for aspiring R7RS systems that can't yet handle the (srfi 130) naming convention, but that's just a guess and there might be a better reason for their presence so I was afraid to delete them. Here's the diff: <https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-130/commit/cd23b63b7eded40b4d098584f32e238136974afc> Regards, SRFI Editor