Re: more corrections for SRFI 132 John Cowan 13 Mar 2016 22:02 UTC
William D Clinger scripsit: > Now that I have implemented that procedure, I think it's a really > strange procedure for this SRFI to be specifying. It would be more > useful to have a vector-select procedure such that > > (vector-select < v k [start [end]]) > > returns > > (vector-ref (vector-sort < v start end) (+ start k)) > > but probably runs faster because it doesn't have to sort the vector. I'm adding this to the SRFI as vector-select! and Alex's code as vector-separate! I think it makes sense to have both, given that if you only care about a single value, you can use vector-select! in O(n) time, whereas if you care about the "top k" values (or bottom k), you can use vector-separate! also in O(n) time. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan xxxxxx@ccil.org The native charset of SMS messages supports English, French, mainland Scandinavian languages, German, Italian, Spanish with no accents, and GREEK SHOUTING. Everything else has to be Unicode, which means you get only 70 16-bit characters in a text instead of 160 7-bit characters.