It's not about vector-cumulate (I didn't find reference to how 'kons' was to be called in the referred message; you meant

different message?)

Now I remember a bit more: At one point, the draft had srfi-43 compatible vector-fold/index and the new

vector-fold; the former calls KONS with (<index> <seed> <element> ...), so it was natural that

vector-fold (no index version) calls KONS with (<seed> <element) ...). But we dropped */index version,

so we have just vector-fold(-right), with KONS calling convention different from fold and string-fold.

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:

On Sep 7, 2016 4:45 PM, "Shiro Kawai" <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I post here to clarify the choice and record it in the post-finalization archive,
> since I didn't find this issue raised in the mailing list.

Thanks.

In my erratum announcement, I included the notes from the pull request:

http://srfi-email.schemers.org/srfi-133/msg/4105187

There was no other discussion on the mailing list, but I wanted to make sure that there was a public record outside of the Github repo.