Per Bothner scripsit:

> I would expect:
>
>   (vector-unfold! vec start end f initial-seed ...)

You're clearly right.  I introduced this function to help compensate
for the loss of index-based vector-map!, but it's a little *too* much
like vector-unfold.  I'll change it.

Thanks for the input.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
De plichten van een docent zijn divers, die van het gehoor ook.
      --Edsger Dijkstra