vector-unfold! argument order Per Bothner 24 Jan 2016 18:58 UTC
Re: vector-unfold! argument order John Cowan 24 Jan 2016 21:25 UTC

Re: vector-unfold! argument order John Cowan 24 Jan 2016 21:25 UTC

Per Bothner scripsit:

> I would expect:
>
>   (vector-unfold! vec start end f initial-seed ...)

You're clearly right.  I introduced this function to help compensate
for the loss of index-based vector-map!, but it's a little *too* much
like vector-unfold.  I'll change it.

Thanks for the input.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
De plichten van een docent zijn divers, die van het gehoor ook.
      --Edsger Dijkstra