editorial inconsistency Per Bothner 24 Jan 2016 23:33 UTC
Re: editorial inconsistency John Cowan 24 Jan 2016 23:51 UTC

Re: editorial inconsistency John Cowan 24 Jan 2016 23:51 UTC

Per Bothner scripsit:

> 5. Procedures
> f
> The argument in this place must be a function of one or more arguments,
> *returning exactly one value*
>
> 5.1. Constructors
> (vector-unfold f length initial-seed ...) -> vector
> ... applying f at each iteration to the current index and current seeds,
> in that order, *to receive n + 1 values*

Thanks.  That conflict was inherited from SRFI-43.  I've fixed it for
the next draft.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
And now here I was, in a country where a right to say how the country should
be governed was restricted to six persons in each thousand of its population.
For the nine hundred and ninety-four to express dissatisfaction with the
regnant system and propose to change it, would have made the whole six
shudder as one man, it would have been so disloyal, so dishonorable, such
putrid black treason.  --Mark Twain's Connecticut Yankee