On 2022-09-18 11:06 +0200, Arthur A. Gleckler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 5:56 PM Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>
> wrote:
>
>
> > Thanks.  Since the SRFI seems to require it, I’d add “This
> > implementation’s basic ideque operations run in amortized O(1) time.”
> >
>
> Would you mind sending a pull request?  I'm uncertain about exactly what to
> do with the existing implementation, e.g. should I remove it in favor of
> this one?  I'm guessing that you want the above sentence added to the
> Implementation section of the document, but having a pull request would
> make that clearer.

Absolutely.  I hestitated to do so because I’m not sure how you and
John want to organize the repo.  Should I add a directory for the new
implementation, and, if so, is it OK to call it srfi/, since this is
supposed to be the “default” sample implementation?

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>