handling reference implementation dependencies Kevin Wortman (29 Feb 2016 23:34 UTC)
Re: handling reference implementation dependencies Alex Shinn (29 Feb 2016 23:39 UTC)
Re: handling reference implementation dependencies Kevin Wortman (02 Mar 2016 23:18 UTC)

Re: handling reference implementation dependencies Alex Shinn 29 Feb 2016 23:39 UTC

How about putting the SRFI reference implementations on snow-fort.org?

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Kevin Wortman <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still chipping away at the SRFI 134 reference implementation. My code
> depends on SRFI 121 generators and SRFI 128 comparators. As far as I know,
> no Schemes support SRFI 121 and 128 yet. Currently I test my code by copying
> certain SRFI 121, 128 source files into my local repository, which is crude,
> but works.
>
> I'd like to make the 134 code friendlier for potential users, working out of
> the box, or as close as possible. Is there a best practice for this? The
> alternatives I can think of are
> 1) add a make target that fetches the SRFI 121, 128 files from github
> 2) copy the relevant files from 121, 128 and commit them to 134
>
> Neither of these really feels right. Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin Wortman
>
> To unsubscribe from this list please goto
> http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=KfUtlceJEu0VPmJIIvvTzNHcTp53Jjg7