|
SRFI 134, Immutable Deques: 150 days
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 May 2016 01:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 134, Immutable Deques: 150 days John Cowan (14 May 2016 02:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 134, Immutable Deques: 150 days
Shiro Kawai
(14 May 2016 02:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 134, Immutable Deques: 150 days
John Cowan
(14 May 2016 02:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 134, Immutable Deques: 150 days
Shiro Kawai
(14 May 2016 23:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 134, Immutable Deques: 150 days
Shiro Kawai
(14 May 2016 23:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 134, Immutable Deques: 150 days
John Cowan
(14 May 2016 23:50 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI 134, Immutable Deques: 150 days John Cowan 14 May 2016 02:05 UTC
Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit: > This is a reminder that SRFI 134, Immutable Deques, has been under public > discussion for over 150 days. (It was first published on 2015/12/9.) A > new draft was published four days ago, which is a good sign. Feedback and > new drafts are welcome! I keep hoping to get enough time to write the implementation: not that it's so difficult, I just haven't had the time. Editing the draft is easy by comparison. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan xxxxxx@ccil.org Original line from The Warrior's Apprentice by Lois McMaster Bujold: "Only on Barrayar would pulling a loaded needler start a stampede toward one." English-to-Russian-to-English mangling thereof: "Only on Barrayar you risk to lose support instead of finding it when you threat with the charged weapon."