SRFI 135, Immutable Texts: 90 days Arthur A. Gleckler (05 Sep 2016 03:29 UTC)
Re: SRFI 135, Immutable Texts: 90 days William D Clinger (05 Sep 2016 12:57 UTC)
Re: SRFI 135, Immutable Texts: 90 days Arthur A. Gleckler (05 Sep 2016 17:50 UTC)
Re: SRFI 135, Immutable Texts: 90 days William D Clinger (06 Sep 2016 13:08 UTC)
Re: SRFI 135, Immutable Texts: 90 days Arthur A. Gleckler (07 Sep 2016 03:20 UTC)

Re: SRFI 135, Immutable Texts: 90 days William D Clinger 06 Sep 2016 13:08 UTC

Arthur A. Gleckler wrote:

> Would you like me to announce a "last call" week, or shall I move it to
> final status immediately?  I'm leaving that up to each author to decide.

I think it would be appropriate to move this one final status
immediately.

> However, I still wish you would write a note explaining your perspective on
> the relative merits of SRFI 135 and SRFI 140.  The WG2 ballot is complete
> now, so it won't affect the outcome of that, but for the purposes of the
> SRFI discussion, it would be a valuable contribution to the discussion.

Okay.  I can't do that today, but I'll try to write something up
by the end of next week.  It can go into the post-finalization
discussion.

Will