textual->text Takashi Kato (09 Sep 2016 11:57 UTC)
Re: textual->text William D Clinger (09 Sep 2016 12:45 UTC)

Re: textual->text William D Clinger 09 Sep 2016 12:45 UTC

Takashi Kato wrote:

> The description of textual->text seems that it accepts only one
> argument, however
> the test case expect it to accept variable length.
>
> Should it be an erratum or invalid test case?

I don't remember what I intended, but it's a lot easier to regard
the test cases as incorrect than to regard the spec as incorrect,
so I favor that resolution of the problem.  I'll wait a decent
interval to see whether other problems come to light, and then
submit a pull request that fixes the test program.

Will