Re: SRFI 137 (minor) '???' typos
John Cowan 29 Jun 2016 05:17 UTC
Sudarshan S Chawathe scripsit:
> Very minor: The SRFI 137 document (draft 1) contains several instances
> of '???' which should probably be arrows or some such symbols. I'm
> guessing these 'typos' are a result of some document-conversion error.
Yes. They are the right arrow. Art, can you replace the ??? sequences
with → please? Thanks.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan xxxxxx@ccil.org
Mos Eisley spaceport. You will never see a more wretched hive of scum
and villainy --unless you watch the Jerry Springer Show.
--georgettesworld.com