Practicality of the srfi
Shiro Kawai
(29 Jun 2016 21:52 UTC)
|
Re: Practicality of the srfi
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(30 Jun 2016 14:45 UTC)
|
Re: Practicality of the srfi
Shiro Kawai
(30 Jun 2016 21:14 UTC)
|
Re: Practicality of the srfi
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(12 Jul 2016 12:07 UTC)
|
Re: Practicality of the srfi
Shiro Kawai
(12 Jul 2016 21:00 UTC)
|
Re: Practicality of the srfi John Cowan (13 Jul 2016 01:07 UTC)
|
Re: Practicality of the srfi
shiro.kawai@xxxxxx
(13 Jul 2016 01:38 UTC)
|
Re: Practicality of the srfi
John Cowan
(14 Jul 2016 01:27 UTC)
|
Re: Practicality of the srfi John Cowan 13 Jul 2016 01:06 UTC
Shiro Kawai scripsit: > So, srfi-137 is certainly useful for having portable implementations of > experiment / PoC / transient code until it is ported on native type system, > etc. It may serve as a common language of defining type-related systems. It can also be used in any R7RS-small system to provide a purely procedural record system that is not coupled with R7RS-small define-record in any way, using the portable SRFI 137 implementation. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan xxxxxx@ccil.org I should say generally that that marriage was best auspiced, for the achievement of happiness, which contemplated a relation between a man and a woman in which the independence was equal, the dependence mutual, and the obligations reciprocal. --Louis Anspacher (1944)