Re: Instance payload
John Cowan
(04 Oct 2016 20:51 UTC)
|
Re: Instance payload
Shiro Kawai
(04 Oct 2016 23:54 UTC)
|
Re: Instance payload
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(24 Oct 2016 12:34 UTC)
|
Re: Instance payload
John Cowan
(26 Oct 2016 18:55 UTC)
|
Re: Instance payload
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(29 Oct 2016 07:33 UTC)
|
Re: Instance payload
John Cowan
(07 Nov 2016 19:34 UTC)
|
Re: Instance payload Arthur A. Gleckler (07 Nov 2016 21:14 UTC)
|
Re: Instance payload Arthur A. Gleckler 07 Nov 2016 21:14 UTC
John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> writes: | On further reflection and discussion (and some prodding | from Art), I agree that accessors of a parent type must be | able to return the payload of a child type, just because | an object of a child type *is* an object of a parent | type. I will leave open, ex silentio, the question of | whether the reverse is true. | | Art, please change lines 131-133 from: I've made the requested change and published the new version: <http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-137/> Thanks to everyone for the discussion. SRFI Editor