On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@nieper-wisskirchen.de> wrote:
I would like to discuss the following amendment to SRFI 139:

Hi, Marc.  This sounds like a worthwhile proposal.  Would you consider it to be a fix for an erratum, or a new feature?  If the latter, it technically requires a new SRFI, although it could be a small one.

SRFI Editor