At the very least "Conversions" section should explicitly mention (as a post-finalization
editorial change?) the recommended idioms for converting to istring or mstring.
If you draft it, Arthur will add it, since it doesn't change conformance in any way.
John Cowan
http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan xxxxxx@ccil.orgBeing understandable rather than obscurantist poses certain
risks, in that one's opinions are clear and therefore falsifiable
in the light of new data, but it has the advantage of encouraging
feedback from others. --James A. Matisoff