|
string-unfold-right
Chris Hanson
(18 Nov 2019 02:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: string-unfold-right
Arthur A. Gleckler
(02 Mar 2020 23:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: string-unfold-right
Per Bothner
(02 Mar 2020 23:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: string-unfold-right
Shiro Kawai
(03 Mar 2020 05:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: string-unfold-right
Chris Hanson
(03 Mar 2020 08:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: string-unfold-right
Shiro Kawai
(03 Mar 2020 08:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: string-unfold-right
Arthur A. Gleckler
(03 Mar 2020 15:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: string-unfold-right Per Bothner (04 Mar 2020 07:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: string-unfold-right
Arthur A. Gleckler
(04 Mar 2020 20:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: string-unfold-right
Per Bothner
(04 Mar 2020 21:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: string-unfold-right
Arthur A. Gleckler
(04 Mar 2020 21:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: string-unfold-right
Per Bothner
(04 Mar 2020 22:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: string-unfold-right
John Cowan
(05 Mar 2020 00:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: string-unfold-right
Arthur A. Gleckler
(05 Mar 2020 05:59 UTC)
|
Re: string-unfold-right Per Bothner 04 Mar 2020 07:04 UTC
On 3/3/20 7:06 AM, Arthur A. Gleckler wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 12:54 AM Shiro Kawai <xxxxxx@gmail.com <mailto:xxxxxx@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> At this moment, a string is a sequence of codepoints, and it's reasonable to expect a grapheme cluster is represented as a string.
> I agree that it is good that the intention is noted, if it is indeed the original intention. I think adding such note won't change the specification so it can be a post-finalization note?
>
>> <http://per.bothner.com/>
>
>
> Per, would this be okay? If so, and someone can provide me with a patch or pull request, I"ll incorporate the change.
How about adding the sentence:
If the mapper returns a string, the string is prepended to constructed string (without reversal).
and this example:
(string-unfold-right null? (lambda (x) (string #\[ (car x) #\])) cdr '(#\a #\b #\c))
=> "[c][b][a]"
--
--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/