Arthur A. Gleckler wrote:

> Hello, Will.  Since both SRFI 135 and SRFI 140 are on the WG2 ballot, and
> since SRFI 140 was prepared in response to 135, would you care to comment
> on the relative merits of the two proposals?  I'd love to know what you
> think before I vote.

I apologize for taking so long to respond.  I was out of town
and away from the Internet.

I voted for SRFI 135.  I understand that to have been a public
vote.  At this time, with the voting about to close or possibly
closed already, I don't want to make any further public comment
on the relative merits of SRFI 135 versus SRFI 140 with respect
to that WG2 vote.

I expect to continue to participate in these discussions, and
may eventually compare the two SRFIs if I think my opinions on
their merits might add to the discussion or be relevant to some
future vote.

Will