Proposed document change
Bradley Lucier
(28 Nov 2022 16:38 UTC)
|
Fwd: Proposed document change
Arthur A. Gleckler
(28 Nov 2022 20:00 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
Taylor R Campbell
(29 Nov 2022 04:27 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
Bradley Lucier
(29 Nov 2022 16:45 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change Taylor R Campbell (29 Nov 2022 18:05 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
Bradley Lucier
(29 Nov 2022 18:26 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
Bradley Lucier
(29 Nov 2022 18:39 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
Taylor R Campbell
(29 Nov 2022 18:39 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
Arthur A. Gleckler
(29 Nov 2022 22:45 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
Bradley Lucier
(01 Dec 2022 14:49 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
Bradley Lucier
(01 Dec 2022 21:30 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
Arthur A. Gleckler
(01 Dec 2022 21:33 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
John Cowan
(05 Dec 2022 05:50 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
Arthur A. Gleckler
(05 Dec 2022 22:52 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
Bradley Lucier
(06 Dec 2022 18:52 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
John Cowan
(07 Dec 2022 02:11 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
Bradley Lucier
(07 Dec 2022 16:04 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
Arthur A. Gleckler
(07 Dec 2022 17:14 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
Taylor R Campbell
(01 Dec 2022 22:09 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
Bradley Lucier
(03 Dec 2022 17:26 UTC)
|
Re: Fwd: Proposed document change
Taylor R Campbell
(04 Dec 2022 17:27 UTC)
|
> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 11:44:52 -0500 > From: Bradley Lucier <xxxxxx@math.purdue.edu> > References: <xxxxxx@jupiter.mumble.net> > > On 11/28/22 9:59 PM, Taylor R Campbell wrote: > > > These 1440 test cases cover zero, units, primes, a square, a composite > > of distinct primes, and a cube. (They don't, however, cover anything > > that requires bignum arithmetic.) I haven't vetted these answers in > > any way other than verifying the tests pass in MIT Scheme -- I > > recommend running them through the property tests, and eyeballing them > > to spot-check for reasonableness. > > Thanks, I'll use this idea. (There's also the balanced/ family.) I forgot about that one. MIT Scheme doesn't have it yet. I guess making test cases for it is left as an exercise for the reader! (If you do, I can add it to MIT Scheme and verify it passes the test cases.)