Jim Rees wrote:

> bitfield-replace and bitfield-replace-same treat the dest / src arguments flipped.

Fixed.  That was a hangover from SRFI 60, whose implementation I adopted.

> bit-field-every? is not implemented (set to #f)

Implemented.

> (bits bool ...) is treating the arguments MSB first, while the spec
> says the first argument is bit #0, and so on.

Fixed as a result of fixing list->integer.

> Related to the above, the specs for integer->list, integer->vector,
> list->integer, vector->integer do not clearly state what the correct
> order is.   The sample implementation clearly uses MSB
> first in a consistent fashion.

Fixed to use LSB first in both spec and implementation.

A git diff is attached.


On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:
I just discovered that srfi-auto-subscribe, which many of us use to keep up with all the SRFI lists, was not subscribed to SRFI 142.  That meant that some of us missed the message Jim Rees just sent about that SRFI.  Here it is:

http://srfi-email.schemers.org/srfi-142/msg/5528253

I've added srfi-auto-subscribe to the subscribers list, so the problem should be fixed.  Also, I don't see any other lists with that problem.

Thanks, Jim.  I'll wait to finalize until John has a chance to incorporate your feedback.