On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Shiro Kawai <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

Would it be too much to also require verifying with the test suite on multiple Scheme implementations, or even multiple independent implementations of SRFI itself, at least when it's relevant?

I've been somewhat belatedly catching up on adding native

implementations of red docket SRFIs to Chibi, thanks to

which I found the recent errata in SRFI 133. For SRFI 142

I did find the argument order of bitwise-if extremely strange,

but unfortunately it agreed with all existing Chibi code using

SRFI 33 bitwise-merge (since I had never updated to SRFI 60),

and I didn't bother mentioning to the list.

In the future I'll try to be a little more proactive about

implementing SRFIs before they finalize.

FWIW, there's a fairly minimal test suite to start from here:

https://github.com/ashinn/chibi-scheme/blob/master/lib/srfi/142/test.sld

Alex