On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Alex Shinn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

Since a primary motivation of this SRFI is performance,
and variadic procedures are slow in many implementations,
it may be worth specifying fx- to always take 2 arguments,
and providing a fxneg (or fx-negate) for the unary case.

That will be in the next release.

Is it worth specifying modular and saturating variants of
+, - and *?

IMO no, we should just have one variant that does whatever

works for the implemetation.

John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan xxxxxx@ccil.org

Samuel Johnson on playing the violin: "Difficult do you call it, Sir?

I wish it were impossible."