On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Marc Feeley <xxxxxx@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:

I wouldn’t want to see atan2, min2, min3, etc. introduced by the same argument.

I agree in general.  However, fx+ and fx* already in R6RS accept exactly two arguments, and fx- accepts exactly one or two.  I think it's reasonable to split this pair up.

-- 
John Cowan          http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
So they play that [tune] on their fascist banjos, eh?
        --Great-Souled Sam