On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@nieper-wisskirchen.de> wrote:

Does it make any sense to ask whether "include" is hygienic or not? "Include" takes strings as arguments, and strings are never renamed due to macro expansion. Or are there unorthodox interpretations of "include" I am not aware of.

It's about whether the included body is interpreted literally or is hygienically renamed in accordance with where it is in use.

-- 
John Cowan          http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
Not to perambulate the corridors during the hours of repose
in the boots of ascension.       --Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel