I see.  I added an independent implementation to Gauche that passes the current chibi-test.  Don't see any issue so far.



On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:13 AM, John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote:

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Shiro Kawai <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

fx=, fx< etc. names disagree between the srfi doc and the reference implementation.   Reference implementation is using fx=?, fx<? etc.
The names without question marks are correct ones?

The names *with* question marks (compatible with R6RS) are correct, since this is basically a lightly adapted version of an R6RS library.  I noticed this a little while ago and forgot to update the docs.

-- 
John Cowan          http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
That you can cover for the plentiful and often gaping errors, misconstruals
and disinformation in your posts through sheer volume -- that is another
misconception.  --Mike to Peter