two fxremainder tests failing on Chicken 5 port of SRFI-143
noosphere@xxxxxx
(17 Nov 2020 22:35 UTC)
|
Re: two fxremainder tests failing on Chicken 5 port of SRFI-143
Arthur A. Gleckler
(17 Nov 2020 22:44 UTC)
|
Re: two fxremainder tests failing on Chicken 5 port of SRFI-143
John Cowan
(17 Nov 2020 23:14 UTC)
|
Re: two fxremainder tests failing on Chicken 5 port of SRFI-143
noosphere@xxxxxx
(17 Nov 2020 23:42 UTC)
|
Re: two fxremainder tests failing on Chicken 5 port of SRFI-143
Arthur A. Gleckler
(17 Nov 2020 23:59 UTC)
|
Re: two fxremainder tests failing on Chicken 5 port of SRFI-143
John Cowan
(18 Nov 2020 00:44 UTC)
|
Re: two fxremainder tests failing on Chicken 5 port of SRFI-143
Arthur A. Gleckler
(18 Nov 2020 00:50 UTC)
|
Re: two fxremainder tests failing on Chicken 5 port of SRFI-143 noosphere@xxxxxx (20 Nov 2020 00:36 UTC)
|
Re: two fxremainder tests failing on Chicken 5 port of SRFI-143
noosphere@xxxxxx
(18 Nov 2020 00:50 UTC)
|
Re: two fxremainder tests failing on Chicken 5 port of SRFI-143 noosphere@xxxxxx 20 Nov 2020 00:36 UTC
I've created a pull request with the fix I applied to the Chicken 5 port of SRFI-143: https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-143/pull/1 Thank you both for your help. --Sergey On Tue 17 Nov 2020 04:50:28 PM -08, Arthur A. Gleckler wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 4:44 PM John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote: > >> The problem is a Chicken-only bug: in the file "srfi-143.scm", which is >> Chicken-4-specific, the import renames fxmod to fxremainder. It should >> rename fxrem to fxremainder, of course. I don't know why this wasn't >> caught before. >> >> This file should be replaced upstream with the Chicken-5-specific version >> that imports `(chicken fixnum)` instead of `chicken`. >> >>> > Thanks. I'll await a pull request or patch.