Looks good to me. 

On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 1:38 PM Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 2:33 AM Shiro Kawai <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
And this is another nitpick...

Entry of fl-greatest and fl-least reads:

    Bound to the largest/smallest finite flonum. (e.g. C99 DBL_MAX and C11 DBL_TRUE_MIN)

Although it is implied by the C99 reference, it may be clearer if it says "the largest/smallest positive finite flonum".  I think it doesn't count as change of spec but just a clarification.

I agree that a clarification can go in if the authors (CC-ed) approve.

Thanks.