I suppose WIll hasn't got time to take a look, but even though I know zero about the implementation, I am more than willing to take Brad's word for it at this point, given that the tests pass.

So go ahead and incorporate the patch.

On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 9:15 PM Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:

On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 5:47 PM Bradley Lucier <xxxxxx@math.purdue.edu> wrote:
I'll try this again. Sorry about the mail problems.

I'm very sorry you haven't had a reply yet.

John and/or Will, would you please take a look?

Thanks.

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:04 AM Bradley Lucier <xxxxxx@math.purdue.edu> wrote:
This is a fix for a FIXME, in case it is desired.

It turns out my git-fu is not truly up to snuff, so I'm including the
patch in this email.

It passes the SRFI-144 tests (using Larceny) and shows improvement in
the tests in the test file test-log1p.scm (compiled using Gambit).

Brad