On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 7:02 PM, William D Clinger <xxxxxx@ccs.neu.edu> wrote:

Now that we've agreed upon that change, I'm wondering whether it might
be a good idea to change the SRFI 144 specifications of flfirst-bessel
and flsecond-bessel so they align with the cited C99 functions jn and
yn, which take their arguments in the opposite of the order specified
by the current draft SRFI.

Makes sense to me. Alex, are you okay with this?

John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan xxxxxx@ccil.org

Reversing the apostolic precept to be all things to all men, I usually [before

Darwin] defended the tenability of the received doctrines, when I had to do

with the [evolution]ists; and stood up for the possibility of [evolution] among

the orthodox --thereby, no doubt, increasing an already current, but quite

undeserved, reputation for needless combativeness. --T. H. Huxley