John Cowan writes:

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 7:02 PM, William D Clinger <xxxxxx@ccs.neu.edu> wrote:

Now that we've agreed upon that change, I'm wondering whether it might
be a good idea to change the SRFI 144 specifications of flfirst-bessel
and flsecond-bessel so they align with the cited C99 functions jn and
yn, which take their arguments in the opposite of the order specified
by the current draft SRFI.

Makes sense to me. Alex, are you okay with this?

As Will guessed, I was indeed confused by this and used the C99 order.

I thinking aligning the order makes sense.

Alex